<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gtvone.com/2009/11/13/canon-ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gtvone.com/2009/11/13/canon-ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii/</link>
	<description>simon pollock music photographer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:58:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gtvone</title>
		<link>http://gtvone.com/2009/11/13/canon-ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>gtvone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gtvone.com/?p=1395#comment-717</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say that it&#039;s getting an extra level of stability in rotational. I love the 100-400 and am glad I didn&#039;t trade it for a 70-200 Mk1 now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say that it&#8217;s getting an extra level of stability in rotational. I love the 100-400 and am glad I didn&#8217;t trade it for a 70-200 Mk1 now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UBPICS</title>
		<link>http://gtvone.com/2009/11/13/canon-ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>UBPICS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gtvone.com/?p=1395#comment-716</guid>
		<description>Intriguing choice of revision if true as it is the one lens that has is almost universally loved. Only benefit that it could bring that I can think is an extra stop worth of IS.

The one they really need to work on is the 100-400, although they probably prefer the sales of the fixed 400.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intriguing choice of revision if true as it is the one lens that has is almost universally loved. Only benefit that it could bring that I can think is an extra stop worth of IS.</p>
<p>The one they really need to work on is the 100-400, although they probably prefer the sales of the fixed 400.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

